On 1 August 2010 06:16, ncage <choclabs74@gmail.com> wrote:
> is a windows machine good enough to get started with ROR Development?
Honestly, without trying to be contentious: no.
You *can* get along getting into Rails using Windows (I started that
way with InstantRails), but you will discover occasional things that
don't work *quite* how you expect, especially when you get to using
lots of third-party plugins/gems. You will probably be better off,
going straight into a *nix environment of some description.
The easiest solution is to use a VM (either install your own, or use
the out-of-the-box VirtualRails [1] for an all-in-one solution, or the
TurnkeyLinux Rails Server [2], either of which you can then customise
to your heart's content).
But if you want to make the leap to Ubuntu as a desktop OS it does cut
out the hypervising midle-man :-)
[1] http://www.virtualrails.org/
[2] http://www.turnkeylinux.org/rails
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Is there a smart way or example for listing terms and conditions and
ensuring that they have been read?
I'm a relative noob to RonR and I'd like to find a good way to do this?
I don't want to store anything in the db, so I just need validation, how
best to do this?
Thanks
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
In beta4 I could do this:
resources :sections do
get :new, :on=>:member
end
But not with RC
If I change "new" to be something else, I can do that
So it seems that "new" is now treated like a reserved word of sorts?
I really need to share the new method between "sections/new" and
"sections/1/new" because my structure is a tree, so it makes sense to
re-use
Anyone know anything about this?
cheers!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.