I am confused by "instead, then rails will allocate the ids."
So do you mean it is improper to do this:
user.Description << d
If it is, can you tell me the proper way to link the association?
Thanks,
Kahou
Dave Aronson wrote in post #1034152:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:12, Colin Law <clanlaw@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 27 November 2011 22:34, Dave Aronson
>> <googlegroups2dave@davearonson.com> wrote:
>
>> instead, then rails will allocate the ids.
> Since it was just for the purpose of a little irb experiment, I didn't
> want to go to the bother of setting up a new app or jumping through
> the hoops to set the other fields needed to make the record saveable.
>
>> Try again with letting rails manage the ids and you may get a different result.
>
> Essentially my advice to the OP! :-) Let's see what he says.
>
> -Dave
>
> --
> LOOKING FOR WORK! What: Ruby (on/off Rails), Python, other modern
> languages.
> Where: Northern Virginia, Washington DC (near Orange Line), and remote
> work.
> See: davearonson.com (main) * codosaur.us (code) * dare2xl.com
> (excellence).
> Specialization is for insects. (Heinlein) - Have Pun, Will Babble!
> (Aronson)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment