Tim Shaffer wrote in post #1038731:
> I apologize... I guess I wasn't sure what you were asking.
No problem!
> ActionController::Base doesn't have *any* methods included.
You're right -- I mis-spoke:
s/"ActionController::Base"/"standard Rails distribution"/g
In addition to the resourceful routes, you'd need extensions to the
various generators and templates, but yep, that's what I'm arguing for.
> I can definitely see your case for wanting to do this.
Upon reflection, the right thing to do would be to open a lighthouse
ticket and let the pros decide. Wish me luck! :)
- ff
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment