Ruby on Rails Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Thanks! I might need that.

There was another caveat I ran into: Active Record subclasses. They do not derive their table name dynamically from their parent class


Op 27 feb 2013, om 00:56 heeft Justin S. het volgende geschreven:

> We are doing something similarly crazy as well, you might try:
>
> ActiveSupport::Dependencies::Reference.clear!
>
> I had to dig deep within the bowels of Active Support for that one :)
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

No comments:

Post a Comment