Ruby on Rails
Saturday, February 1, 2014
Yes, it must be in routes. I forgot. In config/routes.rb it seems to be handle with:
resources :accounts
In the documentation it seems I can specify which methods I want to allow:
is this the correct/ best way to restrict access? Then I can delete my controller method ad view(?)
On Sunday, 2 February 2014 10:46:41 UTC+9, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
-- resources :accounts
In the documentation it seems I can specify which methods I want to allow:
resources :accounts, only: [
:index
,
:new
,
:create
,
:edit
, :update, :destroy]
# no showis this the correct/ best way to restrict access? Then I can delete my controller method ad view(?)
On Sunday, 2 February 2014 10:46:41 UTC+9, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Bizt <marty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I used "rails generate scaffold ..." to build my model, views and
> controllers. However for this particular MVC I don't want to have a show
> template. So, I removed the show method from the controller. But, show still
> appears. Why is this.
What does `rake routes` tell you? Compare that to config/routes.rb.
--
Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.s...@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassan
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/50c0e74d-07c0-47d3-8af2-2b6a347ce3b9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment