Ruby on Rails

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Mansi Shah <mmshah1990@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes cheapest as well as good facilities also.

OK, still missing the point:

What do you mean by "good"? What *exactly* do you care about?

What do you mean by "cheapest"? Lowest bandwidth charges?
Lowest storage charges? Some ratio of the two?

And how would anyone else answer that without knowing the details
of your specific use case?

--
Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassan
Consulting Availability : Silicon Valley or remote

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CACmC4yDZgc_MyELuKdddWk95Vqft9GrwdAcHdMN4p0eGDU2G5A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.