Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Actually, I was thinking about exactly the same, I have already configurable YAML file to skip some part of the system's check. So now, it will be good, to skip some particular issues if we want them to persist.
I'm also was thinking about a few features you already have, so I don't know what to do. Is it fine if I implement them too but with my own code? WDYT?On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 23:39, Greg Navis <contact@gregnavis.com> wrote:
--I'm thinking about 2.0 and want to make it useful in a CI setting. For example, currently there's no way to ignore a warning so it'd always break the build even if it's by design.Best regardsGreg Navis
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rubyonrails-talk/2TaG_XAsF9k/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAA6WWt96O0NZaeLBhs3n3YgZQnYZh-hW5gHRrnh-RFGGz2QgAA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAO53YDoRyj%3DuxZ%3DT6ZTJ0tYkK_4RbB2QYbZo%3D%2BrtX8t82kqboQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment