Ruby on Rails

On Sunday, December 1, 2019 at 11:04:01 PM UTC-5, Walter Lee Davis wrote:

> On Dec 1, 2019, at 10:17 PM, fugee ohu <fuge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A generic scaffold posts to the create action PATCH and PUT according to you in this discussion POST to update Even still new is fetched by GET where new.html.erb renders _form.html.erb  
>
>

I'm not sure if you're confused about what I wrote, or just confused. Here are the actual actions that a generic Rails 6 scaffold generates and responds to. Read the comments before each method:

class FoosController < ApplicationController
  before_action :set_foo, only: [:show, :edit, :update, :destroy]

  # GET /foos
  # GET /foos.json
  def index
    @foos = Foo.all
  end

  # GET /foos/1
  # GET /foos/1.json
  def show
  end

  # GET /foos/new
  def new
    @foo = Foo.new
  end

  # GET /foos/1/edit
  def edit
  end

  # POST /foos
  # POST /foos.json
  def create
    @foo = Foo.new(foo_params)

    respond_to do |format|
      if @foo.save
        format.html { redirect_to @foo, notice: 'Foo was successfully created.' }
        format.json { render :show, status: :created, location: @foo }
      else
        format.html { render :new }
        format.json { render json: @foo.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
      end
    end
  end

  # PATCH/PUT /foos/1
  # PATCH/PUT /foos/1.json
  def update
    respond_to do |format|
      if @foo.update(foo_params)
        format.html { redirect_to @foo, notice: 'Foo was successfully updated.' }
        format.json { render :show, status: :ok, location: @foo }
      else
        format.html { render :edit }
        format.json { render json: @foo.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
      end
    end
  end

  # DELETE /foos/1
  # DELETE /foos/1.json
  def destroy
    @foo.destroy
    respond_to do |format|
      format.html { redirect_to foos_url, notice: 'Foo was successfully destroyed.' }
      format.json { head :no_content }
    end
  end

  private
    # Use callbacks to share common setup or constraints between actions.
    def set_foo
      @foo = Foo.find(params[:id])
    end

    # Never trust parameters from the scary internet, only allow the white list through.
    def foo_params
      params.require(:foo).permit(:bar, :baz)
    end
end

Here's what I have gleaned from this exchange:

You want to start at the "index" view, and have a form on that page send a request to the "new" view, passing along a parameter that you will use to determine what `item_type` is to be created by the "create" method that the form on the "new" view will display.

On your Index page, here's what that form could look like:

<%= form_with url: 'foos/new', method: :get, local: true do |f| %>
<%= f.collection_select :item_type, %w[one two], :to_s, :titleize  %>
<%= f.submit 'Choose', name: nil %>
<%- end -%>

When that form is submitted, you will have access to either 'one' or 'two' in the params[:item_type] variable. You can do something interesting with that in the #new controller method. For a start, just to show that it worked, I changed the generic scaffold new.html.erb page to include this line:

<h1>New <%= params[:item_type].to_s.titleize %></h1>

When I test that, I see either "New One" or "New Two" when that page loads, depending on the choice I made on the index page.

Try some of these suggestions in a new, scaffolded controller in a different Rails app (or the same one, if you've been keeping up with your version control). Just try it as a test, and see what you can learn.

Walter

Thanks Walter Like  Ariel said, form_with does an ajax request by default unless you add 'local: true' I don't know how they keep that a secret

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/e922a2fb-4118-41c4-b719-4f98bda7d1e7%40googlegroups.com.