Ruby on Rails
Sunday, February 16, 2020
Hi everyone,
-- Before submitting and issue in rails github I'm asking if this is a normal behaviour in rails activerecord.
Without table prefix in comments table the following code prints the correct SQL Syntax:
Post.distinct.joins(:comments).where(comments: { user: current_user }).to_sql
SELECT DISTINCT posts.*
FROM
posts INNER JOIN comments
ON comments.post_id = posts.id
WHERE
comments.user_id = 1
With table prefix in comments table the following code prints the wrong SQL Syntax:
Post.distinct.joins(:comments).where(prefix_comments: { user: current_user }).to_sql
SELECT DISTINCT posts.*
FROM
posts INNER JOIN prefix_comments
ON prefix_comments.post_id = posts.id
WHERE
prefix_comments.user = 1
It seems that when using table prefixes rails does not convert the hash condition for the model user to the correct column user_id and of course throws an error.
In rails doc it says that:
author = Author.find(1) # The following queries will be equivalent: Post.where(author: author) Post.where(author_id: author)
And its going to get even worst for polymorphic tables.
Is this excepted or is this a bug in rails and I should open an issue for that?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/9a9006d2-b5c9-4e1a-a3ed-daa191524321%40googlegroups.com.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment