Ruby on Rails Friday, July 2, 2010

For your purpose, subversion and git are the same thing!

I use git. I already have an apache web server with the passenger mod
in place, so deploying my rails app is as simple as:

/path/to/app> $ git pull

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ali Imran <ali.imran.rana@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am also new on Rails, This thread is very helpful. I also started
> development from windows but when i reached at the point of passenger,
> than I moved to Linux Ubuntu.
>
> I start working with godaddy hosting, but face some problems than i
> move to site5.com and successfully upload my first demo project. (its
> working)
>
> Now from this thread i understand the difference between Capis and
> Passenger.
>
> Thanks for all contributes.
>
> Now again when I upload the project from FTP, I found it is so hard,
> Because it is like installing whole application every time, than i
> understand the importance of version control system.
>
> I looked for the way to use any thing else other than GIT, because it
> is not free, but did not find any thing , my question is that
> subversion and GIT work same task or different. If yes than will putty
> is right direction to go with subversion.
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>
>
> On Jun 30, 10:21 am, Jeremy <bathrobewarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Nin,
>>
>> > subject, so @Jeremy - I apologise..
>>
>> No worries at all, you bring up some good points and I welcome anyone
>> who can offer guidance and newbs who might have questions that I
>> haven't thought of or are confused about.  I am learning this all
>> myself so I also do not have a mentor or tutor to guide me through the
>> steps.  All I have is books and video tutorials and the ruby and rails
>> community.
>>
>> Anyway, the point you brought up about Passenger---
>>      "I mean – it didn't make sense I'd use both Passenger and
>> Capistrano
>>      (probably it does but I understood they're both used for
>> deployment,
>>      thus the confusion..), unless Capistrano does both automated
>>      deployment but can also be used when using a different deployment
>>      service.. "
>>
>> and the response that Marnen supplied---
>>      "They are different tools for different purposes.  Capistrano
>> takes care
>>      of putting your app on theserver, while Passenger serves it once
>> it's
>>      there. "
>>
>> This was so great because I was still confused about whether to use
>> Passenger or Capistrano for deployment since I thought they basically
>> did the same thing.  Now that I understand this a little better, it
>> will definitely help me when learning to use them.
>>
>> So, thanks for your contributions to the thread :)
>>
>> @Marnen, and @Hassan--- You ROCK!
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Jeremy
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment