Ruby on Rails

On Aug 2, 1:11 pm, Guo Yangguang <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> > You're rescuing the exception but then you're re-raising it so your
> > render call never happens. Also a more usual way is to call save and
> > test the return value of that rather than call save! and rescue the
> > exception
>
> Thanks fred.But i want transaction(which need save!) to let them all
> either to be saved or not.If i rescue the exception and not re-raising
> it,is it right to handle exception in this way?

in that case you should rescue the exception outside of the
transaction

Fred
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.