Ruby on Rails

I agree with Fred. What does your 'Accept' header in your browser say for the request that throws the 406? eg. Accept:text/css Also, check the content-type in the response headers. You could grab this information using the developer console in safari or chrome, or firebug in firefox.

I saw something very similar which affect Firefox, but not Safari or Chrome.

Luke

On 2010-09-29, at 12:01 PM, lgs wrote:

>
> ... ok, this is the piece of log which works ( Rails 2.3.8 )
>
> [paperclip] Saving attachments.
> SQL (49.3ms) COMMIT
> Redirected to http://localhost:3000/admin/photographer/edit
> Completed in 223ms (DB: 0) | 302 Found [http://localhost/admin/
> photographer]
>
> after migrating to Rails 3.0.0 I get this:
>
> [paperclip] Saving attachments.
> SQL (595.4ms) COMMIT
> Completed 406 Not Acceptable in 812ms
>
> so I guess the failing code in my controller
> Admin::PhotographersController#update is
>
> redirect_to edit_resource_path
>
> ... any suggestion ?
> How can I procede troubleshooting ?
>
> Thanks in advance
> Luca
>
> On Sep 29, 4:53 pm, lgs <luca.so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's goes through Admin::PhotographersController#edit action, opening
>> a form which I have to fill:
>>
>> def edit
>> @photographer = current_photographer
>> end
>>
>> then it goes to Admin::PhotographersController#update :
>>
>> def update
>> @photographer = current_photographer
>> if params[:id]
>> # trying to update a specific photographer on a singular
>> resource is a no-no
>> flash[:notice] = "You can only update your own settings!"
>> redirect_to edit_resource_path
>> else
>> update!{ edit_resource_path }
>> end
>> end
>>
>> here is the controllerhttp://pastie.org/1189038
>> and here it is the viewhttp://pastie.org/1189061( ... or, follow a
>> snap )
>>
>> = form_for(:photographer, @photographer, :url => resource_path, :html
>> => { :multipart => true, :method => :put }) do |f|
>> ...
>> ...
>> %p
>> = f.label :theme
>> = f.select :theme, Photographer.themes
>> %p
>> = f.label :use_watermark, "Automatically watermark your client
>> photos?"
>> = f.check_box :use_watermark
>> ...
>>
>> Luca
>>
>> On Sep 29, 10:06 am, Frederick Cheung <frederick.che...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 28, 9:54 pm, lgs <luca.so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> After migrating my 2.3.9 app to rails 3.0.0 I get this error:
>>
>>>> Completed 406 Not Acceptable in 513ms
>>
>>>> I also noted that processing controller doesn't output the protocol:
>>
>>>> -- Processing by Admin::PhotographersController#update as
>>
>>>> while if it works, say:
>>
>>>> -- Processing by Admin::PhotographersController#update as HTML
>>
>>>> Here is the full action outputhttp://pastie.org/1187051
>>
>>>> Can anyone help me, please ?
>>>> Don't know where to start :-(
>>
>>> At a guess it's because the url being posted to is /admin/photographer.
>>> 1 which may be making part of rails think that the requested format
>>> is .1 (as opposed .html, .xml etc), so when you get to your respond_to
>>> block rails can't generate a response and so generates a 406 instead
>>> (which is http for "I can't generate the kind of response you asked
>>> for")
>>
>>> Fred
>>
>>>> Luca
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.