On 4 September 2010 09:14, Michael Schuerig <michael@schuerig.de> wrote:
> On Friday 03 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>> Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>
>> Well, you learn something new every day! I found the Ambiguous
>> Groups article on the Web and found that the behavior I thought was
>> standard -- returning the first value in the case of multiple values
>> -- is actually a MySQL quirk (ironic when you consider that I
>> haven't used MySQL in years). Back to the drawing board.
>
> I did tell you that you ought to understand a problem before jumping to
> solutions, didn't I? I have to admit I was piqued by your reaction to my
> original question: it was bold -- and ignorant. You don't have to answer
> every question in this mailing list single-handedly.
I think that antagonising those trying to help will not enamour you to
others reading your question. There is nothing wrong with being bold
when answering questions and no-one knows everything. To suggest that
someone is ignorant because they are unaware of that particular mysql
quirk is absolutely ludricrous. By using the definition of ignorant
as 'not knowing absolutely everything' you must include yourself or
you would not have to come here to ask your question in the first
place.
Colin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment