Ruby on Rails Monday, November 22, 2010

Oh wow, I didn't even see that that there was already a defined TestCase class. Well, that makes much more sense! So I'm not going insane, just ... blind. Good to know! As for send ... I thought I read once upon a time that send took more processing time or something similar. I guess it doesn't matter if respond_to is doing essentially the same thing in the end. Either way .. Thanks. This clears up some things driving me insane!


On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Frederick Cheung <frederick.cheung@gmail.com> wrote:


On Nov 22, 10:37 pm, Aedorn Varanis <aed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I feel like I'm missing something rather important in both
> circumstances, but I can't seem to figure either out:
>
> 1) I have a model named TestCase -
> class TestCase < ActiveRecord::Base
>   belongs_to :test_suite
>   scope :queued, lambda { where("test_cases.suite_id IS NOT NULL") }
>   scope :assigned_to, lambda { |sid| where(:suite_id => sid) }
> end
>
> The controller can interact with it perfectly fine. When trying to
> display information from it in either the view or via the view helper
> such as TestCase.all, I get a NoMethodError (undefined method `all'.)
> If I call it with ::TestCase.all, that works. I had a theory that it
> has something to do with the fact that it's associated to another
> model (belongs_to ...), I just can't find anything to confirm that or
> tell me why that happens.
>
You're probably picking up one of the other TestCase classes that are
part of rails or the ruby standard library (eg ActionView::TestCase)
 
>
> @artwork = Artwork.find(params[:id])
> value = params[:value].to_sym
> @artwork.update_attributes(value => !...@artwork.method(value).call)
>
> That gives me a NoMethodError. However, if I add - if
> @artwork.respond_to?(value)  - then it works as expected. Again, I
> can't figure out why.

Attribute accessors methods are only created when they are first used,
so method doesn't find them. If you just use send instead that that
should work fine (since that will hit the method_messing code that
creates those methods (which calling respond_to also does))

Fred
>
> Both items I get working using the mentioned methods, but again, I
> feel like I'm really missing something important here.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment