On Dec 15, 9:40 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> >> Hold it. If there's a habtm relationship between Person and Address,
> >> then Addresses shouldn't even have a person_id. OTOH, if there isn't a
> >> habtm relationship, then the << operation is unnecessary (and I think
> >> it's a syntax error).
>
> >> So...which is it?
>
> > In his original example Address has a person_id field so I was
> > assuming a has_many relationship, not a HABTM.
>
> Which means << is invalid, doesn't it?
Perhaps I'm not understanding what you mean when you say invalid? Do
you mean that it will generate an exception, or that it isn't a good
way to solve the problem?
\Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment