Friday, December 24, 2010
On 25 December 2010 01:39, Colin Law <clanlaw@googlemail.com> wrote:
-- On 24 December 2010 14:31, Marnen Laibow-Koser <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:Good point, I had not thought of that. I should have done.
> Colin Law wrote in post #970471:
>> On 24 December 2010 12:16, Gordon Yeong <anexiole@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You have not provided the gem list output
>>>
>>>
>>> Here:
>>>
>>> ------- Start -----
>>> *** LOCAL GEMS ***
>>> actionmailer (2.3.9)
>>> actionpack (2.3.9)
>>> activemodel (3.0.3)
>>> activerecord (3.0.3, 2.3.9)
>>
>> So you have some rails gems from 2.3.9, some from 3.0.3 and some from
>> both, and in environment.rb you ask for 2.3.5. I don't know why that
>> would cause it to say it was loading 2.3.2
>
> Probably because it's picking up 2.3.2 from vendor/rails.
I said it because I had not thought of a version frozen in vendor,
>
>> but it is certainly never
>> going to work as it is.
>
> Why do you say that?
which I think is a perfectly good reason for saying it, even though as
a statement of truth it is fatally flawed :)
I did notice that it's picking up 2.3.2 from vendor/rails.
I removed vendor/rails and when I ran "script/console", it does not look for 2.3.2 anymore. Instead, it was 2.3.8 (as i specified "RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.3.8' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION" in my config/environment.rb.
I then looked up all the gems in http://rubygems.org/gems/ and made sure the versions were the right ones as per my working development and production machines. Problem solved but i somehow think removing vendor/rails is not so right....
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment