Ruby on Rails Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Thanks gents.

The nice thing about pessimistic locking for me could be that it would
help avoid the user problem to which Walter refers and I wouldn't have
to add columns to all my models, as I would for optimistic locking.

@Fred - I see you've written pretty often on the topic of optimistic
locking. What, to your reckoning, are the minimum changes I'd need to
make to my models & forms to ensure the following:

+ user 1 fails to make any updates to the resource they have obtained
from find
+ user 2 arrives later, finds the object, and should have the ability
to update the resource

Thanks,

Lille

On Mar 29, 12:40 pm, Walter Lee Davis <wa...@wdstudio.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Lille wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm hoping to make a parent and several of its dependent children
> > available for updates by multiple users. I want to figure out how to
> > implement and test the following:
>
> > 1. A user 'checks out' a parent resource: when seeking to update,
> > other users are informed that the resource and its dependent children
> > are currently unavailable for updating.
>
> > 2. A user 'checks out' a child resource: when seeking to update, other
> > users are informed that the child is unavailable for updating, though
> > the parent may be available.
>
> In both of these cases, the only time that the user would "know" that  
> the element was locked is when they request it initially, or after a  
> failure to save due to a lock. Have a read of optimistic locking in  
> the Rails Guide. The only issue I can think of here is one of user  
> frustration. Let's say they had just spent 20 minutes writing an  
> update to a record, now they can't save it, and won't ever be able to  
> save it because the starting point for their edit has moved underneath  
> them.
>
> Walter
>
>
>
> > I think a reason I'm stumped here is that I have little deployment
> > experience. Yet, even so, how would I test the behaviors above,
> > locally?
>
> > Thanks for any comments,
>
> > Lille
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-
> > talk@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
> > .
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment