Ruby on Rails

On Oct 28, 3:38 pm, AWD Switzerland <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> Frederick Cheung wrote in post #1028961:
>
> > In theory I don't think this is needed because different threads
> > should be using different connection objects (there's supposed to be a
> > pool of connection objections, and any member of the pool is only ever
> > used by one thread at a time. You might also want to ask on the rails-
> > core list
>
> Seems practice disagrees with that theory. At least we had exceptions
> due to unsynchronized cache access. And we ourselves did not introduce
> any threads in the code.
> I'll see whether I get answers here. If not, I'll gladly accept your
> advice and take it on to rails-core.
>
It might also be related to https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/1670

Fred
> Best regards
> Stefan
>
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.