Ruby on Rails

Thank you so much for your reply Colin.

I believe you are spot on with your answer and what you suggest will
work and is the correct solution.

For sake of my sanity though, is this solution more of a Rails
convention or have I been getting standard database design confused in
my head for a number of years? To my previous understanding I still see
it as one vehicle has one vehicle_type. Almost like vehicle_type is a
child table to the parent vehicle. Is this wrong thinking for all
database design or just Rails conventions?

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.