Tuesday, August 27, 2013
My personal experience, of course, but the only time I'll ever write Cucumber features is if plain-english acceptance tests are a requirement. Otherwise (95% of the time), I'm quite happy with the RSpec/Capybara combo. The overhead of having to wire together plain-english to regular expressions just doesn't pay off in the end for normal acceptance testing.
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:29:04 PM UTC-5, Jason Hsu, Android developer wrote:
-- On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:29:04 PM UTC-5, Jason Hsu, Android developer wrote:
So far, I've been using RSpec for testing my Rails apps simply because that's what railstutorial.org emphasizes.
However, I am in the process of trying out Cucumber. I like the fact that it's in plain English, and this is an asset for communicating with clients or other people who aren't Rubyists. Migrating to Cucumber sounds like a good idea.
I'm curious about what you prefer. Do any of you know Cucumber well, yet still prefer RSpec? If so, why?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/9c7a0f68-1361-4503-bbdd-6f8cfdd2a6f7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment