Ruby on Rails Tuesday, August 13, 2013

On 13 August 2013 17:46, Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:43 AM, Valentin Kotelnitski <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
>
>> As I see now there is no way of not regenerating model.
>
> No, there is absolutely no need to re-generate your model. *That* is what people are telling you.
>
>> Earlier I just
>> hoped it could be possible to add a piece of hand-written code to my
>> model to access newly added column in the last database migration.
>
> You can do exactly that. It is also likely that you don't even need to.
>
> - Simple access to the column comes for free. You don't need to do anything.
>
> - Of course if you need to use that column within some larger function of the model, you will edit the model to add that. But you will *not* need to edit it to add simple accessors to get/set the column, those come for free and you will just use them.

But before doing anything else work through railstutorial.org or
similar, as I have suggested several times I think. Otherwise in the
future you will look back at your requests for help here and wish to
die from embarrassment.

Colin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAL%3D0gLs5xWcCgs6Qph%2B4euHH3oES8iCMeTJj4d5r-nP%2BunHtUQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

No comments:

Post a Comment