Ruby on Rails Tuesday, August 19, 2014

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Antonio Moreno <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

> Anyways, I tried the order I think you are suggesting:
>
> has_many :children, -> { order 'id asc' }, dependent: :destroy do
>
> with no luck.

I believe this (explicitly wrapping the options hash) should work with
your extension:

has_many :children, -> { order 'id asc' }, { dependent: :destroy } do
def persisted
collect { |a| a if a.persisted? }
end
end

Look at the 'Association extensions' section on the has_many doc
page.

--
Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CACmC4yC87jVM0%2BMFEF%3DmoQNYbD3SOzx6EV_RUQHUBnSzo9e2pw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Post a Comment