Monday, December 22, 2014
On Sunday, 21 December 2014 15:55:26 UTC-5, Star Light wrote:
If it's true. It sounds like some pretty wild stuff. Anyone care to comment about this?
I'll "comment" that this is the second place I've run across this, which is pretty remarkable for a project that currently contains specs but no implementation. ALL ABOARD THE HYPE TRAIN
As to the functionality, an awful lot of what's proposed there sounds like things you could do more clearly using modules / concerns directly. Hard to say for sure without code.
--Matt Jones
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/cb0e62de-0790-4bb6-897b-9c5de57c1591%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment