Ruby on Rails

> While I can applaud the desire, I think in this case you should NOT
> attempt to simplify that in any way, as it would obfuscate what's going
> on. This is clean, terse, and extremely clear what is going on.
>
> If this sort of thing is repeated over and over with different status
> codes, *that* should be simplified into a single method, passing in the
> code.

Thanks Tamara you made me realize that short syntax is not always best.

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/e98cb50b51874d2b747cfb9b42aba11b%40ruby-forum.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.