Ruby on Rails

I see where you're going with this and now that I understand your use case I think acts_as_taggable isn't what you want. You can build a hash with categories that can be manipulated by the user, or you can create a model/association between user/categories/images that would probably fit your use case better.


> On Mar 22, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Johnny Stewart <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
>
> OK, I see what you mean, however, I'd like each user to have their own
> categories only and they would likely only have 5 - 10 max for the most
> part, as they would only be able to put each photo in one category so
> the album analogy would work. So in that sense they are not really tags
> like a taxonomy if you get my thinking? So I still think the taggable
> gems would maybe be better suited in the case of having a taxonomy where
> multiple tags could be used across the site - not just per user, more
> like hashtags on tweets or the like?
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/eebd9941fa6f72330e8f765eab7ee4a1%40ruby-forum.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/9754838D-C74F-4797-A5AB-7D54506C2625%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.