Ruby on Rails
Thursday, August 29, 2019
On the first look I would like your layout more (as something I would expect or design myself). However, I don't know any background on why is this like it is.
Dne úterý 27. srpna 2019 13:24:02 UTC+2 Dominik Menke napsal(a):
-- Dne úterý 27. srpna 2019 13:24:02 UTC+2 Dominik Menke napsal(a):
Hello list,I've noticed ActiveStorage::Service::DiskService does two levels of directory sharding for Blob pathnames:$ tree storage/
storage/
+-- aa/
+-- bb/
| +-- aabb00...
+-- cc/
+-- aacc11...However, when it comes to variants, the sharding is circumvented:$ tree storage/
storage/
+-- aa/
| +-- bb/
| | +-- aabb00...
| +-- cc/
| +-- aacc11...
+-- va/
+-- ri/
+-- variants/
+-- aabb00.../
| +-- <encoded variant file name>
+-- aacc11.../
+-- <encoded variant file name>Should sharding exclude variant/ key prefixes? Maybe the directory layout can look like this:$ tree storage/
storage/
+-- aa/
| +-- bb/
| | +-- aabb00...
| +-- cc/
| +-- aacc11...
+-- variants/
+-- aa/
+-- bb/
| +-- aabb00.../
| +-- <encoded variant file name>
+-- cc/
+-- aacc11.../
+-- <encoded variant file name>This might not actually a problem at all, as the limiting factor on ext4 file systems is the inode index (which allow directories to contain ~10 million entries with 32 character long names (reference); the Base58 blob id is only 24 characters long). I guess with ZFS it's even less of a problem.I was going to create an issue for this, but this might actually be expected/desired behaviour. I'm also not sure if this is a bug or feature request either. I know changing this will cause some headache. I'm primarily looking for other opinions.Kind Regards,Dominik
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/af649317-8e22-4833-b1da-51d9b2d33029%40googlegroups.com.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment