Ruby on Rails
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Well, I'm a newbie in rails and habtm worked just fine for my simple application.
Jason you pointed me in the right direction and after a quick search I did it.
My working code is the following (in case somebody needs it):
<%= check_box_tag "foo[bar_ids][][#{bar.id}]", tag.id, @foo.bars.include?(bar) %>
<label for="foo_bar_ids__<%= bar.id %>"><%= bar.Name %></label>
David, thank you for your answer too.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:29 AM, David Kahn <dk@structuralartistry.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jason Fleetwood-Boldt <tech@datatravels.com> wrote:
On May 30, 2011, at 6:27 PM, David Kahn wrote:<div class="ui-field-contain ui-body ui-br" data-role="fieldcontain"><fieldset class="ui-corner-all ui-controlgroup ui-controlgroup-vertical" data-role="controlgroup"><div class="ui-checkbox"><input id="foo_bar_ids_" type="checkbox" value="19" name="link[bar_ids][]" checked="checked"></div><label for="19">Jquery</label><div class="ui-checkbox"><input id="foo_bar_ids_" type="checkbox" value="25" name="foo[bar_ids][]" checked="checked"></div><label for="25">Web</label></fieldset></div>David,I think I see your problem. The for attribute of the label tag has to match the id attribute of the input checkbox. You have two input checkboxes with ids of "foo_bar_ids_" -- that's not really allowed by HTML, you should make that be "foo_bar_ids_19" and "foo_bar_ids_25"The for of the label tag should match the id of the input tag -- this is actually how HTML works and has nothing to do with rails (see http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_label.asp). I always thought that was counter intuitive myself but that's how it works.To do that, you specify :id => in the check_box_tag and also :for => label_tag (you happen to not be using label_tag, but if you were you could specify :id => )Personally I never use HABTM, because I always find I'm going to eventually want to add a field to the join table which you can't do with HABTM. Use has_many :through => instead of HABTM. (but that is actually irrelevant to the problme you have)
Thats a good point... I just got killed by using HABTM and ended up creating a join model. Especially if you are dealing with nested forms and want to create the join record specifically based on data in the form.
-Jason--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment